<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GALLUP:  Majority of Republicans Doubt Theory of Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schoolofthinking.org/2007/gallup-majority-of-republicans-doubt-theory-of-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schoolofthinking.org/2007/gallup-majority-of-republicans-doubt-theory-of-evolution/</link>
	<description>Escape  -  Search  -  Think</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dani Chatfield</title>
		<link>http://www.schoolofthinking.org/2007/gallup-majority-of-republicans-doubt-theory-of-evolution/#comment-28685</link>
		<dc:creator>Dani Chatfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schoolofthinking.org/2007/gallup-majority-of-republicans-doubt-theory-of-evolution/#comment-28685</guid>
		<description>Thank heavens that i do not live in America!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank heavens that i do not live in America!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharyn Turney</title>
		<link>http://www.schoolofthinking.org/2007/gallup-majority-of-republicans-doubt-theory-of-evolution/#comment-25585</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharyn Turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 22:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schoolofthinking.org/2007/gallup-majority-of-republicans-doubt-theory-of-evolution/#comment-25585</guid>
		<description>In arguments about creation vs evolution, many people join up statemetns that are rational &#38; evidence based with statements that are about beliefs that have no empirical evidence. While they can sometimes go hand in hand ( eg leading scientists have held christian beliefs and continued to be scientists) I think we all should have studied phiosophy and logic at school, so that we could think for ourselves about what it is to be human. The fundamental question of "why are we here" should rather be "why can we think" . The answers should be positive!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In arguments about creation vs evolution, many people join up statemetns that are rational &amp; evidence based with statements that are about beliefs that have no empirical evidence. While they can sometimes go hand in hand ( eg leading scientists have held christian beliefs and continued to be scientists) I think we all should have studied phiosophy and logic at school, so that we could think for ourselves about what it is to be human. The fundamental question of &#8220;why are we here&#8221; should rather be &#8220;why can we think&#8221; . The answers should be positive!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maurice</title>
		<link>http://www.schoolofthinking.org/2007/gallup-majority-of-republicans-doubt-theory-of-evolution/#comment-25493</link>
		<dc:creator>Maurice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.schoolofthinking.org/2007/gallup-majority-of-republicans-doubt-theory-of-evolution/#comment-25493</guid>
		<description>Humans as we are but whatever we create with our limited capacity is
just a poor image of the sovereign creator who created us.

The beautiful house can not stand alone had not the architect conceptualised,designed and built it so for his own satisfaction.

If the double helix genetic code can be decipher through the binary or digital system,
then we are just operating in the poor image of the one who conceptualised and designed it in the first place,are't We?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Humans as we are but whatever we create with our limited capacity is<br />
just a poor image of the sovereign creator who created us.</p>
<p>The beautiful house can not stand alone had not the architect conceptualised,designed and built it so for his own satisfaction.</p>
<p>If the double helix genetic code can be decipher through the binary or digital system,<br />
then we are just operating in the poor image of the one who conceptualised and designed it in the first place,are&#8217;t We?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
